D-NAV Documentation
The language and signals behind faster, clearer decisions
Overview
D-NAV (Decision Navigator) is a framework for making faster, clearer decisions by quantifying the key factors that influence every choice. It transforms subjective decision-making into objective analysis through structured evaluation and real-time insights.
Rate Variables
Score 5 key factors from 1-10
Get Insights
See real-time metrics and patterns
Make Decisions
Act with confidence and clarity
Core Ingredients
The five fundamental variables that shape every decision (rated 1-10 each)
Upside/importance if it works
Time • money • effort • focus
Downside, what could go wrong
How soon action is needed
Evidence & readiness to execute
Scoring Guidelines
Scoring is in-the-moment: 1 = minimal, 10 = maximum. You’re rating how it feels right now — tomorrow’s “10” might change with new info or context.
Derived Signals
Three key metrics calculated from your core variables to reveal decision patterns
Value after cost
Survivability
Execution stress
Strategic Insight
Return (R), Stability (S), and Pressure (P) are the core physics behind every decision. We group them to expose different risks: Return = value after cost, Stability = survivability, Pressure = execution stress. Strategic short-term negative return can be acceptable when Stability stays ≥ 0 and runaway Pressure is avoided.
Each decision gets an R, P, and S sign: R+ (gain), R0 (roughly break-even), R- (loss); P- (calm), P0 (balanced), P+ (pressured); S+ (stable footing), S0 (uncertain footing), S- (fragile footing). These signs feed directly into the Decision Archetypes shown below.
Merit & Energy
The two fundamental components that make up the D-NAV score
Inherent quality of the bet (unit economics minus risk drag)
Applied energy — how hard & how ready you’ll push now
At the system level, we sum these components per category. Category Merit is the total inherent quality of decisions in that category (how strong the bets are after cost and risk). Category Energy is the total execution push (how much urgency × confidence leadership spends there). Together they show where judgment actually creates value and where decision effort is being spent.
D-NAV Formula
The core calculation that combines Merit and Energy
D-NAV blends Merit (quality of the bet) with Energy (execution momentum). High D-NAV = a strong bet and/or a strong push — always read Return,Stability, and Pressure to avoid hidden traps and slow bleeds.
Compare Mode
Side-by-side comparison between a Base scenario and a Scenario you adjust with sliders
Delta (Δ)
ΔX = XScenario − XBase. Positive = Scenario is higher.
ΔReturn
Δ(Impact − Cost) — net value change after cost.
ΔStability
Δ(Confidence − Risk) — survivability change.
ΔPressure
Δ(Urgency − Confidence) — execution stress change.
ΔD-NAV
Δ[(Impact − Cost − Risk) + (Urgency × Confidence)] — overall quality × push change.
Finds the best feasible improvement under your guardrails. Searches small slider adjustments (typically 1-point steps) to maximize ΔD-NAVwhile respecting posture and stability constraints.
Consulting-grade nudge prompts:
- Raise D-NAV without increasing Pressure
- Improve Stability without sacrificing Return
- Reduce Pressure while keeping D-NAV above X
Controls in the optimizer:
- Goal: choose which metric to optimize (D-NAV, Return, Pressure, or Stability deltas)
- Constraints: guardrails that must not be violated (e.g., don't increase Pressure; don't decrease Return or Stability)
- Threshold: minimum acceptable floor (e.g., keep D-NAV at least a target value)
- Urgency-up opt-in: higher urgency often raises Pressure, so the opt-in keeps it explicitly guarded
What you'll see:
- Recommendation label: e.g., Best feasible nudge: Confidence 6 → 7
- Expected deltas across D-NAV, Return,Pressure, and Stability
- Driver list (Top 3) that explains which sliders move the outcome
- Narrative insight: e.g., “Recommendation: Confidence 6 → 7. Expected deltas: ΔD-NAV +4.0, ΔReturn +0.0, ΔPressure −1.0, ΔStability +1.0. Why: improves survivability by raising confidence; reduces execution stress without lowering return.”
System Compare (Adaptation & Entities)
Scenario Compare is local: it shows how a single decision or slider configuration differs from your base case. System Compare looks at judgment physics over time or across entities.
- Adaptation Compare — same entity, different period. Shows how average Return, Pressure, Stability, category weights, and archetype mix shift between snapshots.
- Cross-Company Compare — two entities in the same period. Shows how posture and archetype patterns diverge even if headline outcomes look similar.
In both cases we focus on three deltas: ΔR/ΔP/ΔS (posture), Δ category weight (where judgment load moved), and Δ archetype mix (behavioral identity).
Learning & Momentum
Track short-, mid-, and long-horizon learning signals across your decision stream and by category
Recovery efficiency after dips
Learning Curve Index (LCI) measures recovery efficiency after dips using Rebound / Drawdown. Values > 1.0 mean over-recovery (you bounce back higher than before), values around1.0 mean full recovery, and values < 1.0 mean under-recovery (you don't fully repair the damage).
Trend velocity over the last n decisions via least-squares slope on a moving average
Also calculated for Return, Stability, Pressure
Moving Averages
MAn(X) = rolling average
EMAn(X) = faster, recent-weighted
Cross-Category Effects
Decisions in one arena can influence another (attention/energy budgets). We show both global momentum and per-category momentum.
Defaults: short = 15, mid = 50, long = 100 decisions. Short = steering; mid = course; long = climate.
Recovery Metrics
We track how the system behaves immediately after setbacks:
- Decisions to recover — average number of decisions it takes to return to baseline after a negative dip.
- Win rate after dips — percentage of follow-on decisions after a drawdown that improve the situation rather than worsen it.
- Decision debt — share of decisions that leave a lasting negative footprint even after recovery attempts. High decision debt means bad calls cast a long shadow over the system.
Decision Archetypes
Each outcome is defined by the signs of Return, Pressure, and Stability (R–P–S). Together they describe how the decision felt to make (pressure), how safe it left the system (stability), and whether it created value (return).
Legend: P+ = pressured, P0 = balanced, P- = calm; S+ = stable footing, S0 = uncertain footing, S- = fragile footing; R+ = gain, R0 = flat, R- = loss.
Breakthrough
Gain with stable footing; pressured execution.
Advance
Gain with stable footing; balanced execution.
Harvest
Gain with stable footing; calm execution.
Sprint
Gain with uncertain footing; pressured execution.
Build
Gain with uncertain footing; balanced execution.
Coast
Gain with uncertain footing; calm execution.
Gamble
Gain with fragile footing; pressured execution.
Moonshot
Gain with fragile footing; balanced execution.
Prospect
Gain with fragile footing; calm execution.
Grind
Flat with stable footing; pressured execution.
Maintain
Flat with stable footing; balanced execution.
Idle
Flat with stable footing; calm execution.
Firefight
Flat with uncertain footing; pressured execution.
Routine
Flat with uncertain footing; balanced execution.
Drift
Flat with uncertain footing; calm execution.
Strain
Flat with fragile footing; pressured execution.
Wobble
Flat with fragile footing; balanced execution.
Teeter
Flat with fragile footing; calm execution.
Overreach
Loss with stable footing; pressured execution.
Erode
Loss with stable footing; balanced execution.
Complacency
Loss with stable footing; calm execution.
Burn
Loss with uncertain footing; pressured execution.
Waste
Loss with uncertain footing; balanced execution.
Leak
Loss with uncertain footing; calm execution.
Meltdown
Loss with fragile footing; pressured execution.
Collapse
Loss with fragile footing; balanced execution.
Decay
Loss with fragile footing; calm execution.
Notation Guide
Mathematical symbols and abbreviations used throughout D-NAV
ΔXDelta (change)
Compare: XScenario − XBase. Time series: Xt − Xt−1.
MAn(X)Moving Average
Rolling average over the last n decisions
EMAn(X)Exponential Moving Average
More weight on recent points
Momentumn(X)Momentum
Least-squares slope of MAn(X) (positive = trending up)
LCILearning Curve Index
Rebound / Drawdown around local dips
Loss StreakLoss Streak
Consecutive count of Return < 0

